Acer Swift 3 OLED

MSRP $1,230.00

“The Acer Swift 3 OLED comes with a spectacular show and spectacular efficiency.”

execs

  • Strong mid-range construct

  • Spectacular OLED show

  • Wonderful productiveness efficiency

  • Good keyboard

  • 1080p cam

cons

  • Touchpad is simply too small

  • Under common battery life

Acer has been gradual to leap on the OLED laptop computer bandwagon. However lastly, the corporate has introduced an OLED panel to its fashionable midrange 14-inch laptop computer, the Swift 3.

That is extra than simply the usual Acer Swift 3 with a greater 90Hz OLED display screen swapped in. This laptop computer can be thicker to deal with its 45-watt Twelfth-gen processor, so you need to count on some higher efficiency out of this 14-inch laptop computer. Worth is necessary although, and though the bottom configuration is available in below $1,000, my overview unit landed at $1,230. Happily for Acer, there’s sufficient to justify a barely greater value, making the Acer Swift 3 OLED a strong improve over the unique.

specs

Acer Swift 3 OLED
Dimension 12.32 inches by 8.43 inches by 0.70 inches
weight 3.09 kilos
processor Intel Core i5-12500H
Intel Core i7-12700H
Graphics Intel Iris Xe
R.A.M. 8GB LPDDR5
16GB LPDDR5
display screen 14-inch 16:10 WQXGA+ (2,880 x 1,800) OLED 90Hz
Storage 512GB PCIe 4.0 SSD
1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
contact No
ports 2 x USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 4
2 x USB-A 3.2. gene 1
1 x HDMI 2.1
1 x 3.5mm audio jack
Wi-fi WiFi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2
cam 1080p
working system home windows 11
batteries 57 watt hours
Worth $930+

OLED, sure, however at what price?

Mark Coppock/Digital Tendencies

OLED was reserved for the cream of the crop, however these days, it has dropped into some reasonably priced laptops. For instance, the HP Pavilion Plus 14 additionally provides a 90Hz OLED show for simply $800 with equal specs to the high-end Acer (apart from a smaller 256GB SSD). That is only one configuration, thoughts you, and in the event you use HP’s customized configurator, the worth is greater.

The Asus Vivobook S 14X is one other midrange laptop computer with an OLED show, this one operating at 120Hz, that is $1,100 for a similar Core i7 CPU, 12GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD. The Asus can be obtainable at round $900 when configured identically to the $930 Swift 3 OLED.

Level is — the Acer Swift 3 OLED is correct in the identical ballpark as lots of its shut rivals, however it wants to supply one thing distinctive to rise above.

To start out with, the Swift 3 OLED’s 14-inch 16:10 show is great and competes properly towards each midrange and premium alternate options. You possibly can inform from the desk beneath that, exterior of shade accuracy that is barely behind one of the best, the Acer’s panel is vibrant, colourful, and provides the same old OLED inky blacks. It is a show that may please nearly everybody, together with creatives and content material creators.

Brightness
(nit)
distinction sRGB gamut AdobeRGB gamut Accuracy DeltaE
(decrease is best)
Acer Swift 3 OLED
(OLED)
439 31.380:1 100% 97% 1.31
HP Pavilion Plus 14
(OLED)
398 27.830:1 100% 95% 0.78
Asus VivoBook S 14X
(OLED)
403 27.930:1 100% 99% 1.07
Acer Swift 3
(IPS)
368 1.330:1 98% 75% 1.51
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen 7
(OLED)
406 28.380:1 100% 95% 0.87
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7i Professional
(IPS)
369 1.340:1 100% 80% 1.65
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 7 Carbon
(OLED)
397 27,590:1 100% 96% 0.88

It is an excellent show for Netflix binges too, although the Acer Swift 3 OLED’s audio would not fairly match it.

The audio system are ok, with adequate quantity for a small workplace and clear mids and highs which are nice for system sounds and the occasional YouTube video. However if you wish to watch a film, you may need extra bass than the 2 upward-firing audio system present, so a pair of headphones or exterior audio system are more likely to be appreciated.

Generally sooner does imply sooner

Mark Coppock/Digital Tendencies

As I discussed earlier, producers have put in Intel’s 45-watt Twelfth-gen CPUs in 14-inch skinny and lightweight laptops with various success. In some circumstances, efficiency was thermally restricted to the purpose the place there was little benefit over Intel’s 28-watt CPUs with fewer cores. The commonest different CPU is the 28-watt 12-core/16-thread Core i7-1260P.

As we will see from the desk beneath, the Swift 3 OLED performs extra in keeping with the 14-core/20-thread Core i7-12700H within the bigger and thicker Dell XPS 15 throughout all our benchmarks. The HP Pavilion Plus 14 and Asus Vivobook S 14X are nearer to the Core i7-1260P in Geekbench 5 and our Handbrake take a look at whereas operating sooner in Cinebench R23.

One take a look at the place the Swift 3 OLED fell behind was PCMark 10 Full, which checks a mixture of productiveness, multimedia, and artistic duties. Be aware that I’ve listed each balanced and efficiency mode outcomes, achieved through the use of every producer’s utility for dialing in CPU frequencies and fan speeds.

Mark Coppock/Digital Tendencies

All these laptops throttled to 1 extent or one other, however the Swift 3 OLED managed to keep up its efficiency extra constantly. As a result of it is restricted to Intel’s Iris Xe graphics, it won’t break any data with purposes that use the GPU to hurry up sure duties, like Adobe’s Artistic suite. However, for demanding productiveness workflows and CPU-intensive artistic apps, the Swift 3 OLED is a robust performer.

Geekbench
(single / a number of)
handbrake
(seconds)
Cinebench R23
(single / a number of)
PCMark 10
Full
Acer Swift 3 OLED
(Core i7-12700H)
Bal: 1.698 / 10.972
Perf: 1.708 / 11.287
Ball: 90
Perf: 85
Ball: 1.676 / 10.764
Perf: 1.715 / 11.069
4,983
HP Pavilion Plus 14
(Core i7-12700H)
Ball: 1.462 / 8.531
Perf: 1.472 / 8.531
Ball: 104
Perf: 102
Bal: 1.523 / 8.358
Perf: 1.716 / 10.915
N / A
Asus VivoBook S 14X
(Core i7-12700H)
Ball: 1.595 / 6.692
Perf: 1.681 / 7.175
Ball: 113
Perf: 102
Bal: 1.757 / 10.339
Perf: 1.792 / 12.051
5,378
Dell XPS 15 9520
(Core i7-12700H)
Ball: 1.470 / 9.952
Perf: 1.714 / 11.053
Ball: 100
Perf: 77
Bal: 1.509 / 11.578
Perf: 1.806 / 13.313
4,940
Acer Swift 3
(Core i7-1260P)
Bal: 1.708 / 10.442
Perf: 1.694 / 10.382
Ball: 100
Perf: 98
Bal: 1.735 / 9.756
Perf: 1.779 / 10.165
5,545
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen 7
(Core i7-1260P)
Bal: 1.717 / 9.231
Perf: 1.712 / 10.241
Ball: 130
Perf: 101
Bal: 1.626 / 7.210
Perf: 1.723 / 8.979
5,760
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
(Ryzen 7 6800U)
Bal: 1.417 / 6.854
Perf: 1.404 / 7.223
Ball: 112
Perf: 111
Bal: 1.402 / 8.682
Perf: 1.409 / 8.860
5,647

The Swift 3 OLED’s gaming efficiency was surprisingly poor, even by built-in Intel Iris Xe graphics requirements. I am undecided why the laptop computer was so gradual, hitting simply 11 frames per second in Fortnite at 1200p and epic graphics, however it’s undoubtedly not a gaming machine. I solely embrace these outcomes to emphasize the purpose.

A price in longevity

Mark Coppock/Digital Tendencies

With efficiency as a power, the subsequent query is, how lengthy does it final on a cost? Utilizing the sooner CPU and a high-res OLED show ought to pressure the 57-watt-hour battery, which is not massive for a 14-inch laptop computer.

In our suite of battery checks, the Swift 3 OLED did OK in comparison with the opposite 45-watt laptops in our comparability group whereas falling behind the 28-watt machines. That is to be anticipated, and it is one of many prices of utilizing the sooner chip — though battery life is one other space the place the Acer beat the HP Pavilion Plus 14. Total, the Swift 3 OLED will not final a full day’s work, which means you ‘ll want to hold the ability brick together with you.

Internet shopping Video PCMark 10
Functions
Acer Swift 3 OLED
(Core i7-12700H)
6 hours, 9 minutes 7 hours, 23 minutes 7 hours, 48 ​​minutes
HP Pavilion Plus 14
(Core i7-12700H)
4 hours, 29 minutes 7 hours, 29 minutes 5 hours, 48 ​​minutes
Asus VivoBook S 14X
(Core i7-12700H)
6 hours, 20 minutes 8 hours, 18 minutes 7 hours, 1 minute
Acer Swift 3
(Core i7-1260P)
8 hours, 2 minutes 14 hours, 10 minutes 10 hours, 1 minute
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 Gen 7
(Core i7-1260P)
9 hours, 10 minutes 12 hours, 45 minutes 8 hours, 32 minutes
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
(Ryzen 7 6800U)
8 hours, 4 minutes 13 hours, 13 minutes N / A

Every part else is ho-hum

By way of its design, the Swift 3 OLED advantages most from the change to a taller 16:10 show over the non-OLED model’s old-school 16:9 panel. That makes the laptop computer look extra fashionable and offers a extra productive expertise. In any other case, the identical silver chassis with easy traces and no bling makes for a minimalist design that borders on boring. HP’s Pavilion Plus 14 is a extra engaging laptop computer.

The construct high quality stays the identical, with an all-aluminum chassis that resisted most bending and flexing throughout my testing. It is a strong construct for a midrange laptop computer, though once more, the Pavilion Plus 14 wins, by a hair on this case. The Swift 3 OLED is thicker than the non-OLED mannequin at 0.70 inches versus 0.63 inches and heavier at 3.09 kilos versus 2.76 kilos. Once more, that is essential to accommodate the sooner and warmer CPU. Regardless of its uptick in thickness and weight, the Swift 3 OLED is a fairly sized 14-inch machine.

Connectivity stays a power, with Thunderbolt 4 and the newest wi-fi requirements available. The 14-inch laptop computer sometimes has benefits over 13-inch machines relating to plugging in, and the Swift 3 OLED maintains that pattern.

Mark Coppock/Digital Tendencies

The Swift 3 OLED’s keyboard appears to be the identical as on the opposite mannequin, with mild and snappy switches and loads of key spacing. The keycaps are massive sufficient, though the silver keys are onerous to learn with the backlighting turned on with any ambient lighting. However, the touchpad can be the identical because the earlier mannequin, which is a disgrace — given the taller show, there’s extra room on the palm relaxation for a bigger touchpad. It really works properly sufficient with quiet and exact buttons, however it’s simply too small. The show is not touch-enabled, which I all the time miss.

Mark Coppock/Digital Tendencies

The webcam is a 1080p model, which is welcome, and it supplied a vibrant picture with Acer’s Temporal Noise Discount know-how serving to out in low-light situations. It is a good webcam for video conferencing.

Lastly, Home windows 11 Good day passwordless login assist is supplied by a fingerprint reader embedded within the energy button, which is exactly the fitting spot. It labored shortly and reliably throughout my testing.

A good first go to an OLED machine

Mark Coppock/Digital Tendencies

In the long run, there’s lots to love in regards to the Swift 3 OLED. It leverages its sooner CPU, not like another 14-inch machines, and its OLED show is nearly as good because it will get. Its construct high quality is strong for a midrange machine, though not one of the best in its class, and its connectivity and keyboard are wonderful. The touchpad’s too small and the battery life is simply too brief, that are the laptop computer’s two most important weaknesses.

Besides, it competes properly towards the 2 most pertinent alternate options within the HP Pavilion Plus 14, which is out there in a single configuration for round $400 much less, and the Asus Vivobook S 14X, which is nearer in value. And also you’re solely paying $100 extra in comparison with the non-OLED Swift 3, which makes the OLED model a relative discount. The Swift 3 OLED’s value could be a smidge too excessive, however it’s principally justified.

So, do you have to purchase it? Sure, if sooner efficiency to go along with the spectacular show is your goal. You may endure in battery life, however exterior of the one extremely low-cost HP Pavilion Plus 14 configuration, the Swift 3 OLED offers a compelling sufficient worth to belong on anybody’s shortlist.

Editors’ Suggestions



close

Subscribe Us to receive our latest news in your inbox!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here